
By Joseph P. Shelton
In a landslide victory with 68 percent of the votes, the constitutional amendment authorizing a new statutory framework for enforcement of restrictive covenants in Georgia was passed by Georgia voters on November 2, 2010.
The new framework goes into effect immediately, but it will only be applied to restrictive covenants that are signed on November 3, 2010 or thereafter.
Is this a big deal or a radical change? Absolutely. Georgia law has long been known for its “unfriendliness” towards non-competes and other post-employment restrictive covenants.
However, the statutory framework which has now been endorsed via the constitutional amendment will allow Georgia courts/judges flexibility in enforcing non-compete and other restrictive covenant provisions in employment agreements whereas before they had no meaningful wiggle room. The law also affects franchisor-franchisee, distributorship, lease, and partnership agreements.
But remember, the new Georgia law will only apply to agreements that are signed beginning November 3, 2010 and after. If an agreement was signed prior to that time, it will be governed by the old case law. Therefore, unless your agreements were tightly written to comply with the previous law, the constitutional amendment is of no impact for you … until and unless you get new/amended agreements signed by your workforce.
Although the changes that will result from the new law are many, the most significant change is that Georgia courts/judges will have the ability to modify what would be an otherwise over broad provision.
Previously, Georgia judges did not have the discretion to modify, sever or blue pencil restrictive covenants in employment agreements (although there was a limited exception in the context of a sale of a business).
Click here if you are interested in reviewing the new statutory framework.
This was originally published on Fisher & Phillips Non-Compete and Trade Secrets blog.

















“How much do you think the way we need managers/leaders to "realize" what you talk about is because of the . . . ”
— ENJOYWorkWith.Me on Employee Loyalty? No, It’s Not Dead – It Just Changed Hands, 2 hours ago
“This is the great 21st century challenge for HR, management, and anyone concerned with the long term viability of the . . . ”
— Keisha Jackson on Employee Loyalty? No, It’s Not Dead – It Just Changed Hands, 10 hours ago
“Great point! What else will they want control over?!”
— Eric Gaydos on Relax – You’ll Never, Ever be Asked For a Facebook Password, 10 hours ago
“Derek, great piece. My own work also suggests that recognition is a top driver of employee engagement and loyalty (along . . . ”
— Kevin Kruse on Employee Loyalty? No, It’s Not Dead – It Just Changed Hands, 12 hours ago
“How very true. The positive impact of a leader admitting mistakes (as long as it's not all the time) and allowing others . . . ”
— jonbaker on 3 Steps to Help You Own Up When You Make The Big Mistake, 15 hours ago