
Editor’s note: The TLNT Radio show is a weekly podcast where we talk to the top minds in talent management. New episodes are posted here at TLNT every week. Make sure you subscribe to TLNT and get our daily newsletter for the latest, or subscribe to our podcast in iTunes to automatically get updates.
One of our most popular posts on TLNT last year was one by Laurie Ruettimann about how you shouldn’t Google or Facebook her during the recruiting process. And every time we talk about social media screening, we get a healthy response from our readers.
While there seems to be a lot of interest in the subject, it is obvious that not many people are taking a regimented look at how to actually use the tools that are out there. And more importantly, how to avoid the pitfalls that come with it.
Social media screening
This week on TLNT Radio, I talked with Bill Glenn from background screening provider TalentWise about the use of social media as a screening tool. It was the result of a conversation we had at the HR Technology Conference in Las Vegas last month about how everyone seems to be inundating them with questions about how to use these tools effectively.
During our discussion, we covered a wide variety of topics on the subject of social media. Most importantly, our conversation focused on doing them the right way: consistently, using only public information and with the applicants knowledge and written consent.
I know that many employers aren’t using social media screening solutions (Glenn obviously advises you do so) and some are content just doing an occasional Google search on particular candidates. I won’t pretend that’s not what I’ve done in the past (nor what many HR professionals tell me they have done) but let’s not pretend that’s a great process.
Sourcing versus screening
Of course, one of the things I would have liked to get into is this idea that social media sourcing is a de factoscreen in and of itself and should be taken under the same precautions. As I posted a month ago about this very topic:
The point is, if you have humans as part of your sourcing process, you can as easily fall into the same traps that you do when you screen for candidates using social media. Excluding someone from a list of candidates is, in all practicality, the same as excluding them further down the line.
Now certainly the risks are different. As I mentioned above, a candidate who doesn’t even know they’ve been excluded from a recruiting list is almost a non-risk, especially in comparison to someone who has made it through several steps and then is excluded.
But isn’t it just as bad? Shouldn’t we be just as cautious as we are with social media sourcing as we are with social media screening?”
That’s the next step and maybe the issue we’ll talk about next when we tackle this subject again. As for now, take a listen in on the podcast below and let us know your thoughts on social media screening.




















““ 'It’s not about how good you are at the beginning, but about how good you can become.' He admonished . . . ”
— Crystal Spraggins on SHRM Chicago 4: Mark Kelly, Gabby Giffords and a Big Dose of Inspiration, 8 hours ago
“Tim, thanks for the nice piece here. One of the most common objections I hear is "oh, my you're . . . ”
— Acertiv on Lessons From SHRM Chicago: The 3 Big Misnomers About HR Technology, 12 hours ago
“Hi Jennifer. Thanks for commenting, and no, I'm not a recruiter. Now, I'm intrigued by this statement "Its not realistic . . . ”
— Crystal Spraggins on Jerking Around Candidates on Salary? Not a Way to Start a Relationship, 13 hours ago
“Wendell - I wholeheartedly agree that there always has to be a component of HR analysis that is purely focused . . . ”
— DavidBernstein_eQuest on Big Data: Just Another Big Fad For HR, 14 hours ago
“At least he's a far better choice than Hillary Clinton.”
— William Schabel on SHRM Chicago 3: Dan Pink on Why We’re All Really Salespeople, 15 hours ago