
It takes two teams to play the hiring game and each team has a different, but similar, objective:
- The hiring side wants to hire the best person for the job.
- The applicant side wants to get the best job possible.
As in professional sports, the best teams are built through aggressive recruiting and rigorous selection to meet the highest standards.
How both sides play the game
The playing field is the interview.
The ball is the job offer.
At the start of the game, the company has the ball because they control the job offer. In the first quarter, the company asks questions and the applicant answers them.
It is, of course, the objective of the applicant to get the job offer from the company. (Which can be done honestly and ethically, or, through fabrication and slight of hand. It is up to the employer to determine which.)
The teams gain or lose yardage based upon the quality of the questions asked and answers given.
In the second quarter, the applicant asks questions and the company answers, but the company still has possession of the ball
In the third quarter, the game either ends because the applicant is unsuccessful or a job offer is extended and the applicant now has the ball.
In the fourth quarter, it is the objective of the company to get the employee to accept the job offer. (Which can be done honestly and ethically or through fabrication and slight of hand. It is up to the applicant to determine which.)
Win one for the Gipper!
A preliminary win-win situation is declared when both teams agree and the job offer is accepted.
A final win-win is determined once the employee has been on board a while and the employer is happy with the person’s results and the employee is still glad to have accepted the job offer.
If the employer is unhappy with the new hire’s performance, ideally, that person will be cut from the roster and the employer will once again spend the time, money, and effort it takes to recruit and select a new player. (Unfortunately, too many employers decide to live with their hiring mistakes. This jeopardizes the company’s ability to win on the larger playing fields versus their competition.)
If the employee is unhappy (because the employer misrepresented the job or any other reason), he/she will either resign, or worse, stay on the team, but only half-heartedly, for the paycheck.
Whether you are an employer or an applicant, now that you understand the game, go on out and “win one for the Gipper!” (But do it with honesty and integrity. Anything else undermines the best efforts of both teams.)
This was originally published in the June 2012 Humetrics Hiring Hints newsletter.




















“John, Who would be your dream speaker?”
— Amy Dean on SHRM Chicago 3: Dan Pink on Why We’re All Really Salespeople, 28 minutes ago
“Powerful. Thought provoking article”
— Claudia Psonak on Agile or Disengaged? How to Avoid Managing by Exception, 10 hours ago
“I have had a chip on my shoulder since 1975 -- but at some point, you let it go. :)”
— lruettimann on SHRM Chicago Insights: Take Criticism Seriously, Not Personally, 17 hours ago
“I will write about politics later. That is important.”
— lruettimann on SHRM Chicago Insights: Take Criticism Seriously, Not Personally, 17 hours ago
“Carol Great article. I really enjoyed your article and how the word engagement has become so overused. . . . ”
— Ellen Einsohn on I’m Getting Really Tired of All the Talk About Employee Engagement, 17 hours ago