
Every so often, I’ll write a post about bad employee recognition practices I’ve heard of or read about. Today’s stories made me cringe.
Don’t make people recognize themselves
The husband of one of my team members (we’ll call him Jim) works for a very large, global organization. He often works on a project with an extended team of engineers and other technical personnel. At the end of one such project recently, the team was pleased to learn they’d brought the contract in on time and under budget.
Due to the terms of the contract, this means Jim’s company earned more money. To the company’s credit, they decided to share some of the additional earnings with the team members.
The way leadership went about doing so, however, leaves much to be desired. Jim – and the rest of the team members – were asked to complete forms themselves explaining why each thought he or she deserved to receive a piece of the award.
In essence, they were asked to recognize themselves for their efforts. How much more effective could this have been if the relevant managers had taken just a few minutes to show they paid attention to the good work being done by their team members and filled out the forms instead?
“Losing” has no place in employee recognition
I’m often asked about the role of gamification in employee recognition. There can be a limited, appropriate role, but usually the way it’s done only serves to destroy any benefit from the program itself.
Case in point: United Airlines’ new Outperform Recognition Program. Apparently, United customers are encouraged to use a mobile app to recognize United employees for good service. Then, United will select only 16 “winners.” It doesn’t matter how many people were recognized for their excellence, only 16 can “win.”
For the rest of those recognized, they hear that as: “If they are the winners, then I’m a loser.” Is that the message you want to reinforce? Especially in a company currently on the hot-seat for losing a 10-year-old child and demonstrating a complete lack of caring at every level?
Let me put it this way – if an employee says to you, “If I did work well enough to be recognized for it, why am I loser?” then your recognition program itself is the real loser.
(For another story of an airline getting it thoroughly wrong, read this post from Paul Hebert.)
You can find more from Derek Irvine on his Recognize This! blog.






















“Eric, solid points! I wanted to add a comment focused on your readers who use recruiters: DO YOUR HOMEWORK. . . . ”
— Fred Elmore on Why the Candidate You Hired Isn’t the Employee Who Actually Showed Up, 1 hour ago
“Thank you Reese. Very re-assuring information. Yes we have found this the case as well dis-engagement of your employees is . . . ”
— tai aguirre on The Trick In Getting Buy-In From Employee Engagement Skeptics, 1 hour ago
“Well that...and many of the items you listed are protected by anti-discrimination laws (ADA, Title VII, etc.) either directly or . . . ”
— Timothy Koirtyohann on Why You Shouldn’t Judge a Candidate by Their Background Check, 2 hours ago
“Dare I say, I had a boss like this. She was old school and didn't understand us, the Gen Y . . . ”
— Adam on Five Reasons Your Employees Like It When You Stay Home, 5 hours ago
“Totally agree with you Erik. Thanks for the informative read. I implement integrated workplace wellness programs across Australia and have . . . ”
— Helena Davis on Employee Wellness is Simply a Matter of Employee Engagement, 12 hours ago