
By Eric B. Meyer
Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court reconvened for it’s 2012-2013 term.
Although not chock full of pending employment-law cases, this term will see several important issues decided which could affect your workplace. Below, I have a collected a series of links to stories on these cases:
- New Supreme Court Term Promises a Range of Labor and Employment Cases by Lindsey Marcus and Jeff Nowak at Franczek Radelet P.C.;
- 2012 SCOTUS Employment Law Preview from Phil Miles at LawfficeSpace.com;
- Employment Cases on the Supreme Court’s 2012-13 Docket from the folks at GPH Employment Law Blog.
Of the five employment law cases on the Supreme Court’s docket this term, the one in which I am most interested is Vance v. Ball State University, in which U.S. Supreme Court will clarify just who is a “supervisor” for purposes of Title VII.
This was originally published on Eric B. Meyer’s blog, The Employer Handbook.




















““ 'It’s not about how good you are at the beginning, but about how good you can become.' He admonished . . . ”
— Crystal Spraggins on SHRM Chicago 4: Mark Kelly, Gabby Giffords and a Big Dose of Inspiration, 1 hour ago
“Tim, thanks for the nice piece here. One of the most common objections I hear is "oh, my you're . . . ”
— Acertiv on Lessons From SHRM Chicago: The 3 Big Misnomers About HR Technology, 4 hours ago
“Hi Jennifer. Thanks for commenting, and no, I'm not a recruiter. Now, I'm intrigued by this statement "Its not realistic . . . ”
— Crystal Spraggins on Jerking Around Candidates on Salary? Hell of a Way to Start a Relationship, 6 hours ago
“Wendell - I wholeheartedly agree that there always has to be a component of HR analysis that is purely focused . . . ”
— David Bernstein on Big Data: Just Another Big Fad For HR, 6 hours ago
“At least he's a far better choice than Hillary Clinton.”
— William Schabel on SHRM Chicago 3: Dan Pink on Why We’re All Really Salespeople, 8 hours ago