
I wonder why most hiring managers and HR folks don’t do what is obvious? For example:
- Hire tough so they get to manage easy.
- To have a happy work place, why don’t they hire happy people?
- Why don’t they go looking for the type of employees they want to hire instead of hoping they will walk in the door? (They usually don’t. They are too busy working someplace else.)
- If they know they can get more by paying more, why not pay more and expect more?
- Since one of the key motivators is recognition and, in most cases it doesn’t even cost money, why don’t they give more recognition?
- If you only get one chance to make a first impression, why don’t they make the first day on the job the best day any new employee will ever have?
- Since it pays to learn to fail fast, why do they hold on to employees who aren’t pulling their weight?
This was originally published on Mel Kleiman’s Humetrics blog.




















“Tim, thanks for the nice piece here. One of the most common objections I hear is "oh, my you're . . . ”
— Acertiv on Lessons From SHRM Chicago: The 3 Big Misnomers About HR Technology, 35 minutes ago
“Hi Jennifer. Thanks for commenting, and no, I'm not a recruiter. Now, I'm intrigued by this statement "Its not realistic . . . ”
— Crystal Spraggins on Jerking Around Candidates on Salary? Hell of a Way to Start a Relationship, 2 hours ago
“Wendell - I wholeheartedly agree that there always has to be a component of HR analysis that is purely focused . . . ”
— David Bernstein on Big Data: Just Another Big Fad For HR, 2 hours ago
“At least he's a far better choice than Hillary Clinton.”
— William Schabel on SHRM Chicago 3: Dan Pink on Why We’re All Really Salespeople, 4 hours ago
“Hello China. If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times--by and large our hiring systems are broken, . . . ”
— Crystal Spraggins on Yes, There’s a Skills Deficit, But How About Just Filling Some Open Jobs?, 4 hours ago