I often get asked what are the big trends I see today in HR and talent management, and all this past week at the 65th SHRM Annual Conference & Exhibition in Chicago, I found myself getting asked that question a lot.
So, I’ll tell you what I told all of them.
Here are three big trends I’m seeing right now:
- There is a non-stop push for more rules and regulations coming out of Washington from all manner of federal agencies and departments — NLRB, EEOC, Department of Labor, OSHA, and others. This is largely due to the activist nature of the current administration, and, the complete and total abdication by Congress to do anything except argue, bicker, and play politics. Businesses and organizations are having to spend a disproportionate amount of time on the defensive, reacting to the tsunami of regulations, and it shows no sign of slowing any time soon.
- Social media is becoming a huge factor in the workplace, as both laws and technology try to get a handle on how it can be better leveraged to improve business results for all manner of organizations.
- The debate over the future of HR — where it is going and what its proper role and focus should be — is intensifying as the tired, old “seat at the table” talk is replaced by a much more interesting discussion about the essential value of human resources in the larger organizational structure.
Back to the past for HR
It’s this last point that I’m the most interested in, because the future of HR may actually be found in its past, as former HR executive Liz Ryan points out.
I’ve written here before about how much I appreciate the incredibly smart advice that Liz regularly dispenses in her management column at Bloomberg Businessweek, but it is when she focuses on HR that she is at her very best.
So, it was appropriate that just last week, as we were getting ready for SHRM 2013 in Chicago, that Liz addressed the future of HR in an article titled Getting HR Back Into the People Business. Here’s how she spun it, and it certainly grabbed my attention:
When I started in HR, it was understood that you were going to work with people. You expected to get good at calming angry people down, listening to them share their problems, and untangling thorny interpersonal issues. That sort of thing went with the territory in the quaint 1980s. After all, the HR department has “human” in its name. How could anyone be an HR person without wading right into the deepest part of the people-at-work mosh pit?”
THAT’S the HR I know, love, and fondly remember — the HR focused on people, who were there to help you solve your problems, who helped walk you through whatever it was you were dealing with, and, who acted as a great sounding board you could bounce talent management issues off at any time.
Whatever happened to those kinds of HR people?
Where HR has gone wrong
Yes, those HR pros played such a huge role in my career that I still remember the best of them by name today even though I can’t hardly remember most of my former bosses I actually reported to. I’m thinking of people like Bev Johnk, the HR director at The Orange County Register, or Keith Bulling, my compadre and HR leader at the Great Falls Tribune in Montana, and the late Carole Medeiros, the Vice President for Human Resources at the Hawaii Newspaper Agency.
Of the three, I think Keith is the only one still working — he’s currently the VP of Human Resources at the Cincinnati Enquirer — but all three still percolate in my memory when I think of how HR used to be and how we desperately need to get back to that now.
That’s what Liz Ryan’s column really focused on, and she’s on the right track when she writes:
Nowadays, HR people tell me that the process parts of their jobs are the only kind of work they’re allowed time for and the only kind their leadership values. What we are left with is amassive engine that’s called HR, with parts and pieces to process job seekers, new employees, benefit plan members, compensation plan subjects, and other categories and file folders of people. That’s people processing. That’s not HR, not in my book.
We’re taking the HR function, particularly in large organizations, down a deadly spiral that can only lead to one outcome: the commoditization and outsourcing of HR, a sure sign that the era of people-focused HR is dead.”
Wanted: a greater focus on people and business
That’s the big gripe about HR today — it’s too much about process and paperwork, and not nearly enough about people and business development. This is the primary focus when so many talk about “the future of HR.”
But, Liz has an answer (as you knew she would), and it is one we all should be thinking about:
It’s time to bring the people function back into HR and let the benefits administrators and on-call sales compensation specialists oversee the bits and bytes and processes. HR people are needed desperately on the front lines, where customer relationships are made or broken, new products get launched or get waylaid, and trust grows on a team (or doesn’t). HR people are needed on the scene, where managers struggle with their own tug-of-wars between duty to the organization and duty to themselves and their colleagues. This is where HR people can add value.”
After the better part of a week in Chicago at SHRM 2013, I can’t help but think that the future of HR is in going back to the future, to recapture that essential role as trusted adviser, counselor, and consigliori about all things talent.
Yes, THAT’S the real future of HR, and it’s the only way to get the mojo back.
The stigma of flex work
Of course, there’s more than the future of HR in the news this week. Here are some HR and workplace-related items you may have missed. This is TLNT’s weekly round-up of news, trends, and insights from the world of talent management. I do it so you don’t have to.
- Lack of engagement pulling everyone down. Yes, employees are largely disengaged, and we just saw another study about that this week. And here’s one take on it, as reported in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune: “Disengaged employees and their bosses are both to blame. The trend is bad overall because disengaged employees are not as productive as engaged employees; can upset the workplace, and bad-mouth the company to customers and prospective employees.”
- The stigma of flex work. There’s been a huge debate this year over the viability of flex work (thanks Yahoo!), but here’s a wrinkle to that discussion — there may be a workforce stigma attached to those who seek flexible job arrangements. As The New York Times reported, “Many times these policies are on the books, but informally everyone knows you are penalized for using them,” said Joan C. Williams, founding director of the Center for Work-Life Law at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, referring to the array of flexible work arrangements some employers offer. “I invented the term ‘flexibility stigma’ to describe that phenomenon. Recent studies have found that it is alive and well, and it functions quite differently for women than it does for men.”
- Yes, there are millions of jobs waiting to be filled. Is the famous War of Talent returning? Maybe yes, maybe know, but one thing is certain — there are a lot of unfilled jobs out there. As the Atlanta Journal-Constitution‘s The Biz Beat Blog notes, “Looking for a job? The federal Bureau of Labor Statistics says there are 3.8 million of them out there that need filling. … The good news is that 40 percent of the vacancies were in the South. State-by-state figures were not available.”
- What makes for the happiest workplaces? Ever wonder what makes a workplace happy? The Minneapolis Star-Tribune makes the case that, “The elements of a happy workplace are more fundamental: quality of management, pay and promotion opportunities, overall workplace culture, job flexibility, a sense of helping make the world a better place. Oh, and an occasional picnic or party doesn’t hurt. “
- Classic workplace scene, from Glengarry Glen Ross. Here’s a classic workplace encounter that’s fun to watch again, from the film Glengarry Glen Ross. Remember — ABC, Always Be Closing.