By John E. Thompson
Readers will recall that, in 2010, the U.S. Department of Labor announced that it would pay particular attention to multi-party business arrangements that it sees as obscuring or diluting responsibility for complying with the federal Fair Labor Standards Act.
The Labor Department’s “fissured industry” enforcement effort seeks to tie together all of the participants, including subcontractors, vendors, suppliers, and the like.
Recent developments underscore that the Wage and Hour Division is indeed looking for opportunities to assert that different entities are sufficiently integrated with one another to make each participating business a joint-employer. The Division is also making good on its warning that it would “bring pressure to bear” upon brand owners to induce them to insist upon and monitor FLSA compliance by others with whom they share a business relationship. Read more…
“Brett --- thanks for your insight. I can't think of anything to add!”
— jacque vilet on The Recruiting Dilemma: Do You Look for Cultural Fit, or for Innovation?, 7 hours ago
“In my experience, it's most effective to have a neutral person asking the questions. That could be an online survey, . . . ”
— Seth McColley on Exit Interviews: The 2nd Most Worthless Activity HR Has to Handle, 9 hours ago
“Great post Reese. I think the employer plays a huge part in creating the type of environment that facilitates . . . ”
— Lisa Shelley on The Employee Engagement Choice: Is It a Job, a Career, or a Calling?, 10 hours ago
“Yes, Megan! So true. They see "job hoppers" as unstable. The reality is we don't live in . . . ”
— Brett W. Gould on The Recruiting Dilemma: Do You Look for Cultural Fit, or for Innovation?, 12 hours ago
“Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Jacque. You touched on something I think is very important. "Pace". Speed of . . . ”
— Brett W. Gould on The Recruiting Dilemma: Do You Look for Cultural Fit, or for Innovation?, 12 hours ago