
Employee engagement seems to be the buzzword constantly reverberating throughout the global HR arena. But is it legitimate?
I mean, really, does it matter if employees are engaged? Are organizations with engaged employees any better off?
And I’m not talking about employees being better off emotionally (no one cares about that). I mean does the company have a stronger financial performance and operational efficiency with engaged employees? If not, then employee engagement is just another time-wasting hoax for executives to deal with until the HR department comes up with a bigger-and-better distraction to throw their way. Read more…





















““ 'It’s not about how good you are at the beginning, but about how good you can become.' He admonished . . . ”
— Crystal Spraggins on SHRM Chicago 4: Mark Kelly, Gabby Giffords and a Big Dose of Inspiration, 7 hours ago
“Tim, thanks for the nice piece here. One of the most common objections I hear is "oh, my you're . . . ”
— Acertiv on Lessons From SHRM Chicago: The 3 Big Misnomers About HR Technology, 11 hours ago
“Hi Jennifer. Thanks for commenting, and no, I'm not a recruiter. Now, I'm intrigued by this statement "Its not realistic . . . ”
— Crystal Spraggins on Jerking Around Candidates on Salary? Not a Way to Start a Relationship, 12 hours ago
“Wendell - I wholeheartedly agree that there always has to be a component of HR analysis that is purely focused . . . ”
— DavidBernstein_eQuest on Big Data: Just Another Big Fad For HR, 13 hours ago
“At least he's a far better choice than Hillary Clinton.”
— William Schabel on SHRM Chicago 3: Dan Pink on Why We’re All Really Salespeople, 14 hours ago