What if Human Resources had to sell their services to their customers, fulfill the promise, and be paid based upon results?
How many HR teams would get passing grades from the executive team, the leaders and the employees?
I came across a cute blurb in Travel & Leisure magazine called “Confessions of a Hotel Reviewer” who travels incognito to hotels where there has been a complaint, and inspects the level of customer service.
Actually, I remember that well from years ago when I was a desk clerk at a Holiday Inn. Everyone panicked for weeks before the inspector was “due” because the implications of failure were severe.
A store customer can reasonably expect to get some version of good merchandise, good price and good style. A hotel customer should be able to expect the promises made on their website. A patient expects high quality and safe care.
Who are HR’s customers?
As HR practitioners, do we think of the Board and executive leadership, of the leadership team and of the employees, as our customer? Hopefully because we are HR professionals, we know what they need. But do we know what they want?
If we know what they want (e.g., fire an employee) but that is not in their best interest, do we help them understand why?
Years ago, someone in a company I worked for coined the phrase, “find a way to say ‘yes.’ ” We stumbled over ourselves until we realized that there are some times that “yes” is not the right answer, but neither is “no.” Not being able to give the customer what they want is a unique opportunity to explain, educate, influence and communicate authentically.
Human Resources as a business
But let’s go back to the first question. What if HR was not an overhead department, but a business offering human resources services to the organization? How would we know whether we are fulfilling the promise of the engagement?
First, we would need to be clear on our products and services, right? We would define exactly what we would do for the customer, and what it would cost.
Then we would probably negotiate a bit, and come up with an agreed upon engagement. We would probably provide a “service level agreement,” where we would commit to certain levels of service with a penalty for failure to provide. That’s pretty standard vendor engagement process.
Article Continues Below
Is Talent Acquisition a Strategic Business Partner to Companies?
Oh, and part of the sourcing and engagement process wold probably be a thorough review of regulatory and legal requirements, to ensure that we, as the vendor, were protecting our client. We would most likely have provided a thorough overview to the organization, educating them on the need for the services, both from a regulatory perspective, as well as a business perspective.
That’s not usually how we do it
However HR typically is not an outsourced provider and instead is an overhead department, often raising questions in line management like “why am I paying for this?” and “why can’t I do that?”
I wonder if perhaps there is an opportunity for HR to avoid some of the “overhead” whining by treating the work as if it were being paid for the value being provided.
Many Human Resource teams spring up out of necessity – someone needs to do the hiring, someone needs to determine pay levels, someone needs to do training. Being busy, we keep on keeping on.
Could HR do all of this?
What if we followed the vendors’ playbook with our customers?
- Clearly define expectations. Work with all of the constituents to define what must be done, what should be done, and what could be done – and why. Come to agreement on the products and services, along with the cost to deliver.
- Provide options and facilitate decisions. In reality, the business needs to make a decision about the level of products and services, along with the cost. If HR decides for them, and provides more than they want, the business won’t see the value and will continue to whine about overhead.
- Engage customers in the development of programs, products and services. As I have pointed out before, HR should not “own” policies or programs without ensuring that the leadership team knows the implications of those policies – bad or good. They’re paying for this work (in personnel and equipment), and should know what they are getting.
- Ask the customers routinely if HR is providing the level of service to which both parties agreed. The service expectations may be different, therefore the responses different, for each of three customers – executive leaders, leaders and managers, and employees. Use the results of the research to report back progress, and frame products and services going forward. This is where the accountability resides – is HR fulfilling the promise.
The stores, the banks, the hospitals routinely review their success in fulfilling their promise. Should HR not do the same?
This originally appeared on the ….@ the intersection of learning & performance blog.