I must say that all this talk about SHRM’s decision to offer its own certification is mighty intriguing, and as a certificate holder (SPHR) I did panic a little after first hear-ing the announcement.
But then I read John Hollon’s article about it here on TLNT, and I felt better.
In fact, my thoughts moved from “What the hell? We’ve finally gotten to the point where employers are thinking this certification means something, and now SHRM is trying to put a halt to all that and confuse everyone in the process?” to “Really? Is that what’s needed for the advancement of the HR profession?”
Does HR need another test?
If you recall, SHRM’s announcement included this tidbit:
… SHRM’s Board recently reached the conclusion that it’s best for SHRM to move forward with the development of a competency-based certification, which is urgently needed for the advancement of the HR profession and HR practitioners.” (Emphasis mine.)
Now that caught my attention, because I’ve been thinking about the profession even more than usual lately, wondering why so many HR practitioners are so awful at what they do.
Yeah, I said it.
And even after you consider that some enter the profession practically as an after-thought, and others (such as the company’s CFO/CEO/finance director/office administrator) are appointed although they have absolutely no talent for or interest in the profession, you’re still left with a whole bunch of HR “pros” who are pretty terrible.
And I know, because the ones I haven’t met through networking events or work-related activities I’ve heard all about from friends, family, acquaintances, and (my personal favorite) readers.
So when I think about what the profession needs, another test is not what comes to mind.
What does the HR profession REALLY need?
What does come to mind? How about some flippin’ courage? Or maybe a little heart?
And while you’re at it, throw in a good dose of knowledge beyond the superficial, the ability to reason like a grown up, integrity that’s been tested and found secure, a measure of emotional intelligence, and a moral compass with a needle that’s not, you know, completely broken.
Pardon me if I sound a little strident, but it’s frustrating. Another test won’t advance the HR profession — the idea is laughable. The damn practitioners have to advance the profession, and that won’t happen without some disruption the likes of which we haven’t even begun to see, as far as I can tell.
Am I wrong? Then let me have it in the comments.